Uttarakhand High Court

WPMB/662/2026 of M/S BABAJI ADVERTISING AGENCY Vs CANTONMENT BOARD NAINITAL on 13 August 2026

2026:UHC:7202

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Misc. Bench No. 662 of 2026 13 August, 2026 M/s Babaji Advertising Agency --Petitioner Versus Cantonment Board Nainital --Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Parikshit Saini,

UKHC010143462026

2026:UHC:7202-DB

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition Misc. Bench No. 662 of 2026

13 August, 2026

M/s Babaji Advertising Agency

--Petitioner

Versus

Cantonment Board Nainital

--Respondent

-------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel for the respondent

ORDER

1. The petitioner has called in question the order dated 07.08.2026, whereby the bid of the petitioner submitted on the GeM portal in pursuance of advertisement no.GEM/2026/B/7759256 has been rejected.

2. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel appearing for the Cantonment Board submits that the entire tender process has been cancelled.

3. In view of the aforesaid fact, the challenge does not survive. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.

(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)

(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 13.08.2026 Rajni

1

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead