Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/678/2024 of MAJOR SANDEEP RANA Vs UNION OF INDIA on 13 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/678/2024 Major Sandeep Rana --Petitioner Versus Union of India & Others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB/678/2024
Major Sandeep Rana
--Petitioner Versus Union of India & Others --Respondents
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Major Sandeep Rana, petitioner- in-person, through VC. Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for the Union of India. Mr. Piyush Tiwari, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, for the respondent no. 3, 4 and 5.
Petitioner is serving as Major in 130 Infantry Battalion, Territorial Army, Eco Kumaon at Pithoragarh since 13.12.2023. He was transferred to
Infantry Battalion, Territorial Army, Bihar, vide order dated 10.10.2024. Petitioner challenged the said order mainly on the ground that he is transferred before completion of normal duration of posting i.e. three years at Pithoragarh. Coordinate Bench passed interim order on 21.10.2024, staying the effect and operation of the transfer order till next date of listing. On the strength of that interim order, petitioner is continuing at Pithoragarh.
Learned Counsel for the respondents submits that the ground taken by petitioner for challenging his transfer is factually not correct; as per the policy, applicable to officers of Territorial Army, normal period of posting at one place is two years and not three years, as contended by the petitioner.
Major Karan Singh Sandhu, Legal Officer, Territorial Army Directorate, Army Headquarters, New Delhi is physically present in Court. He made a statement that the competent authority will recall the transfer order, impugned in this writ petition, and pass fresh order of posting in respect of petitioner within four weeks. He further assures that permanent status, which petitioner is having right now, will not be disturbed because of his posting. He further assures that the competent authority will try to accommodate the petitioner at some peace or modified field station.
Law is well settled that judicial interference with order of transfer passed in respect of government servants has to be minimal and that is more so in case of army officers. This Court do not find any reason to interfere in the matter, especially when petitioner has served at one place for more than two and half years.
Writ petition is disposed of by taking the statement made by Major Karan Singh Sandhu on record.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
13.8.2026 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab 198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6 FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.08.13 19:51:54 +05'30'