Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/914/2023 of RAFIQ AHMED Vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR on 12 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/914/2023 Rafiq Ahmed --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate Haridwar --Respondent with WPMS/917/2023 Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010047382023
2026:UHC:7164 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/914/2023
Rafiq Ahmed --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate Haridwar --Respondent with WPMS/917/2023
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Devendra Pant, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, they are clubbed together and are being heard & decided by a common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of WPMS/914/2023 alone are being considered and discussed.
4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:-
“I) Issue an issue appropriate order direction the respondents to decide the application moved by the petitioner for demarcation of the land of the petitioner depicted situated Village Habibpur Kuri Tehsil Laksar District Haridwar Which Khasra Number are 290.”
5. In sum and substance petitioner seeks direction to the competent authority to take decision on his application for demarcation of land, filed UKHC010047382023
2026:UHC:7164 under Section 41 of Land Revenue Act.
6. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that due to some difference in the khasra and sajra, petitioners’ land could not be demarcated. He submits that if petitioners take necessary steps for correction of sajra and furnishes corrected sajra before the Assistant Collector concerned, then necessary order shall be passed without any further delay on petitioners’ application.
7. The writ petitions are, therefore, disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned State Counsel.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.08.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403 d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6 ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.12 19:08:30 +05'30'