Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2451/2026 of MANISH SHARMA Vs SHEELA SHARMA on 12 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2451/2026 Manish Sharma … Petitioner Versus Sheela Sharma … Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr.
UKHC010142482026
2026:UHC:7157
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports,
orders or
proceedings
or directions
and
Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2451/2026
Manish Sharma
… Petitioner
Versus
Sheela Sharma
… Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Rishab Ranghar, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:-
I. Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, in the nature of certiorari quashing of impugned order dated 29.05.2026 passed by Ld. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.). Dehradun in Original Suit no 107 of 2026 "Sheela Sharma and another vs Manish Kumar & others" marked as Annexure no.10 at page no 50 to 150 and thereby allowing the interim injunction application filed by the petitioner/defendant no 1 and 2 being paper no 19Ga2.
II. Issue an appropriate wit, order, or direction, quashing of umpugned common order dated 04.08.2026 passed by L.d. District Judge Dehradun in Misc. Civil Appeal no 37 of 2026 "Sheela Sharma and another vs Manish Kumar and others and Misc. Civil Appeal no. 42 of 2026 "Manish Kumar and others vs Sheela Sharma and another", marked as Annexure no.12 at page no. 166 to 174 and thereby allowing the Mise. Civil Appeal no. 42 of 2026 "Manish Kumar and others vs Sheela Sharma and another”.
3. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
12.08.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f 3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58 531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.12 06:04:10 -07'00'