Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/162/2021 of SHRI VIJAY PAL Vs HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED on 12 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/162/2021 Shri Vijay Pal --Petitioner Versus Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

UKHC010009722021

2026:UHC:7163 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPMS/162/2021

Shri Vijay Pal --Petitioner Versus Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited --Respondent

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Faizan Ali, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Menka Tripathi, Advocate for the respondent.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the reliefs as claimed do not survive, due to efflux of time.

3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.08.2026 Mahinder

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead