Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/2071/2026 of AMIT THAPLIYAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 11 August 2026
S L. N o. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2071/2026 Amit Thapliyal & another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand & another --Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010137572026
2026:UHC:7072 S L. N o. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/2071/2026 Amit Thapliyal & another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand & another --Respondents
Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Ms. Sudha Tamta, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State.
3. Petitioners have filed this writ petition alleging that despite the names of the petitioners having been recommended for appointment by the Selecting Body- UKSSC on 24.04.2026, respondents have not issued appointment letters to them.
4. This Court, vide order dated 05.08.2026, called upon the learned State Counsel to seek instructions on the aforesaid aspect of the matter within three days.
5. Today, learned State Counsel passed on instructions dated 09.08.2026 to this Court, which are taken on record. On instructions, he submits that both the petitioners, namely, Amit Thapliyal and Kuldeep Kumar, have been issued appointment letters on 07.08.2026.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in view of the subsequent development, since petitioners have been issued appointment letters and the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed, UKHC010137572026
2026:UHC:7072 the writ petition has become infructuous.
7. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed, as there is no order required to be passed in the present writ petition in the aforesaid circumstances. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
11.08.2026 AK
AVNEET KAUR Digitally signed by AVNEET KAUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=a82175252dc1a0f53f0e245a1c11df9aa490cfd 1403838bf52f9acab4cc3a5b9, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=5BEC18DADE54688668187E4D722C2ED BFDAF35AB2F676A551481BE62508FDDEE, cn=AVNEET KAUR Date: 2026.08.11 18:30:56 +05'30'