Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/259/2023 of SHUBHAM ALIAS SHIVAM Vs SUNITA SINGH on 11 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/259/2023 Shubham Alias Shivam --Petitioner Versus Sunita Singh and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010012802023
2026:UHC:7137 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/259/2023
Shubham Alias Shivam --Petitioner Versus Sunita Singh and others --Respondents
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Additional CSC for the State. Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Devesh Kandpal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Judgment debtor has filed this writ petition challenging order dated 20.07.2022, passed by the Executing Court, whereby his objection filed under Section 47 CPC was rejected. He has also challenged the order passed by First Additional District Judge, Haridwar in Civil Revision No. 46 of 2022, whereby order of executing Court was affirmed.
3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, submits that in terms of the decree passed in the suit for UKHC010012802023
2026:UHC:7137 specific performance filed by his client, sale deed has been executed. Thus he submits that the decree stands executed. Copy of the sale deed produced in Court by Mr. M.C. Kandpal, learned Senior Counsel is taken on record. Registry is directed to paginate the same.
4. Since sale deed is executed in terms of the decree passed by trial Court, therefore, challenge to the order whereby petitioner’s application under Section 47 CPC was rejected, do not survive.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.08.2026 Mahinder