Uttarakhand High Court

WPMS/2372/2026 of NAURATAN Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2372/2026 Nauratan --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. I.D. Paliwal,

UKHC010137772026

2026:UHC:7120

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPMS/2372/2026

Nauratan

--Petitioner

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand

--Respondent

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:-

(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to prevent/stop the illegal mining from Khasra No. 353 measuring at about 0.1640 hectare which is situated at Sultanpur Patti, Tehsil Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

4. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that a case has been registered against the petitioner for illegal mining on 29.07.2026 based on an inspection, which was held on the same day. Learned State Counsel thus submits that the writ petition appears to be a counter blast of registration of case against him.

5. The relief, as claimed by petitioner, cannot be granted in the writ petition. Some theft of minor/mineral has taken

UKHC010137772026

2026:UHC:7120 place from the agricultural field of the petitioner, then the only course available to him is to approach the Police Authorities.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)

11.08.2026 Aswal

NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726F BB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.11 05:50:18 -07'00'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead