Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/3502/2018 of M/S GRAISON Vs REGIONAL MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA on 11 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3502/2018 M/s Graison --Petitioner Versus Regional Manager Central Bank Of India and another --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010187052018
2026:UHC:7112 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/3502/2018
M/s Graison --Petitioner Versus Regional Manager Central Bank Of India and another --Respondents
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. No representation for the petitioner. Ms. Monika Pant, Advocate for the Bank.
2. Petitioner took a loan from Central Bank of India, which he could not repay. The Bank, therefore, initiated proceedings by invoking power available under SARFAESI Act, 2002. Thus feeling aggrieved, petitioner filed this petition in 2018, seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash impugned E-auction Information dated 28-10-2018 passed by the Respondent No. 2 by which the property of the petitioner would be auctioned on 30-11-2018.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash impugned the possession notice dated 15-09-2018 issued by the Bank passed by the Respondent.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant time to petitioner for deposit some reasonable amount and to continue the regular installment of UKHC010187052018
2026:UHC:7112 the petitioner with the Bank.
3. This Court do not find any reason to interfere in the matter, as petitioner has the remedy of approaching Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.
4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternate remedy.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.08.2026 Mahinder