Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/3135/2018 of NAJIS QURAISHI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 11 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3208/2018 Anavar --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent With WPMS/3135/2018 WPMS/3137/2018 WPMS/3139/2018
UKHC010171512018
2026:UHC:7098
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/3208/2018
Anavar
--Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
With
WPMS/3135/2018
WPMS/3137/2018
WPMS/3139/2018
WPMS/3209/2018
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Duishyant Mainali, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. M.P. Kohli, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. B.S. Negi, learned counsel for respondent no. 4.
4. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore, they are being heard and decided together. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPMS No. 3208 of 2018 alone are being considered and discussed.
5. Petitioner was issued licence for selling Mutton by Zila Panchayat, Uttarkashi for the Financial Year 2018-
19. The said licence was, however, cancelled by the Tax/Revenue Collector, Zila Panchayat, Uttarkashi vide order dated 09.10.2018. Thus, feeling aggrieved, petitioner has approached this UKHC010171512018
2026:UHC:7098 Court.
6. Coordinate Bench granted interim order staying effect and operation of the impugned cancellation order.
7. Learned counsel for the respondent points out that the validity period of the licence issued to petitioner expired on 31.03.2019, therefore, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, do not survive.
8. This Court finds substance in the said contention. Since the licence was granted to petitioner(s) for a limited period, therefore, upon expiry of that period, the claim, sought in the writ petition, do not survive.
9. The writ petitions are, however, disposed of with liberty to petitioners to apply afresh for licence to the Competent Authority and if they make such application(s), the same shall be dealt with, as per law.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
11.08.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f980 2a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C 22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.11 05:48:54 -07'00'