Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2368/2026 of SAJID Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 11 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2368/2026 Sajid --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mohd. Matlub, learned
UKHC010137302026
2026:UHC:7078
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2368/2026
Sajid
--Petitioner
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mohd. Matlub, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate appearing for respondent no. 4.
4. According to the petitioner, respondent no. 4 has encroached upon the only public path available to resident of Village Khempur Thathola, Pargana Manglaur, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. In this regard, petitioner has made a representation to District Magistrate, Haridwar on 21.07.2026.
5. Petitioner confines his prayer and submits that District Magistrate be directed to decide that representation.
6. Learned State Counsel, however, submits that the land belonging to Gram Sabha was exchanged with respondent no. 4 by an order passed under Section 161 of UPZA&LR Act on 24.04.2010. He, however, submits that he has no objection if District Magistrate is asked to look into the issue raised by petitioner.
7. The writ petition is, accordingly,
UKHC010137302026
2026:UHC:7078 disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate, Haridwar to consider and decide petitioner’s representation dated 21.07.2026, as per law, within four weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. It goes without saying that respondent no. 4 shall also be given opportunity of hearing before taking final decision in the matter.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
11.08.2026 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.11 05:53:21 -07'00'