Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/2113/2026 of KENDRA PAL SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 11 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No.2113 of 2026 11th August, 2026 Kendra Pal Singh ………..Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others ………..Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010140032026
2026:UHC:7090 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Service Single No.2113 of 2026 11th August, 2026
Kendra Pal Singh ………..Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others ………..Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. R.C. Tamta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Narayan Dutt, learned S.C. for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
The petitioner is a retired Lecturer (Physics). He was initially appointed as an Assistant Teacher (L.T. Grade) (Science and Mathematics) on 28.08.1981. Subsequently, he was promoted to the post of Lecturer (Physics), from which post he ultimately retired on 31.07.2009.
2. The petitioner after retirement staked claim for selection grade as well as promotional grade to be paid to him w.e.f., from date of his entitlement.
3. For the said benefit, the petitioner moved several representations to the respondent no.3-Additional Director (Education), Kumaon Division, Nainital, amongst which 16.03.2026 is the latest one, annexure no.8 to the writ petition.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the aforesaid representation is pending disposal with respondent no.3-Additional Director (Education), Kumaon Division, Nainital and if he is directed to decide the representation dated 16.03.2026, annexure no.8 to the writ petition, in a time bound manner, ends of justice would be met.
UKHC010140032026
2026:UHC:7090
5. Learned counsel for the State submits that the appointing authority of the Lecturer is respondent no.2- Director, Secondary Education, therefore the representation should have been made by the petitioner to the respondent no.2-Director, Secondary Education and not to Additional Director, Kumaun Division, Nainital.
6. This Court finds substance in the submission made by learned State counsel.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2-Director of Secondary Education, within a period of two weeks from today. In the event that such a representation is submitted by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, respondent no.2-Director of Secondary Education, shall consider and decide the same within a further period of three months from the date of receipt thereof.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
11.08.2026 SK
SHUBHAM KAPRUWAN Digitally signed by SHUBHAM KAPRUWAN DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=a29a2f80b93835a432d093afc472d9355959ee0ff878380c645e17d546a24821, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=B505B049BA2FDAC35E7AE325DEE1505D6C35AF3D290C229CDC609D61801E1E4 F, cn=SHUBHAM KAPRUWAN Date: 2026.08.11 18:29:31 +05'30'