Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/515/2026 of DR NARENDRA KUMAR SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 10 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 10th August, 2026 WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 515 of 2026 Dr. Narendra Kumar Singh ------Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others

UKHC010137612026

2026:UHC:7021-DB

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

AND

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY

10th August, 2026

WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 515 of 2026

Dr. Narendra Kumar Singh

------Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Others

----Respondents

Presence:-

Ms. Mansi Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

Ms. Rajni Supyal and Mr. Vivek Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr.

C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4, 5 and 6.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by a notice dated 29.05.2026 issued by the University mentioning the names of faculty members and other employees who would retire during the academic year 2026-27, i.e. July 2026 to June 2027, and wherein the name of the petitioner, who is Professor, Maize Breeder, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, Govind Ballabh Pant Agriculture and Technology University, Pantnagar is shown at Serial Number 1. His age of retirement has been shown as 60 years, and according to which, he would retire on 31.08.2026.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon an order dated 27.06.2024, passed by a Coordinate Bench in WPSB No. 344 of 2024, in respect of a

UKHC010137612026

2026:UHC:7021-DB Professor of Agronomy in Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jeolikote, Nainital, which is an Extension Center of G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology. The said writ petition was disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the University. The submission of the petitioner in the said case was that his claim was covered by the judgment in WPSB No.333 of 2023, Dr. Anuradha Dutta vs. State of U.P. and Others, and other connected matters, decided by a common judgment dated 21.05.2024.

3. Learned Counsel for the University as well as Learned Standing Counsel have no objection, in case, the present writ petition is also decided in same terms.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the Competent Authority of the University. It is further provided that, in case, any such representation is made within 48 hours, the Competent Authority shall take decision thereupon within two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)

(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 10.08.2026 PP/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead