Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/2428/2026 of PUSHPA DEVI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 10 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2428/2026 Pushpa Devi --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another --Respondents Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Ms. Seema
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010140542026
2026:UHC:7033 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2428/2026
Pushpa Devi --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & another --Respondents Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Ms. Seema Sah, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand/respondents.
3. Mother of the petitioner was employed as Group-D employee in Nainital range of Forest Division and she was allotted a Government accommodation. Petitioner’s mother retired in the year 2022.
4. On 29.07.2026, petitioner has been asked to vacate the official accommodation provided to her within a week. Petitioner contends that due to medical problems, it is not possible for her to immediately vacate the accommodation, especially during rainy season. Petitioner contends that she has made a representation to the Forest Range Officer concerned, who may be directed to take decision thereupon.
5. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection, if the Range Officer is directed to take decision on the representation.
UKHC010140542026
2026:UHC:7033
6. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by directing the Range Officer, Nainital Range to take decision on petitioner’s representation, as per law, within three months from today. For a period of two months or till decision is taken on petitioner’s representation, whichever is later, petitioner shall not be evicted from the accommodation in question.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.08.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131b b4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653 D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.10 14:03:38 +05'30'