Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/51/2025 of RAVINDRA DATT SEMALTI Vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE TEHRI GARHWAL on 10 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/51/2025 Ravindra Datt Semalti --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate Tehri Garhwal and another --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010001892025
2026:UHC:7027 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/51/2025
Ravindra Datt Semalti --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate Tehri Garhwal and another --Respondents
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the respondent.
2. According to the petitioner, he has made a representation to the Director, Rehabilitation; but, no decision is being taken thereupon.
3. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel appearing for THDC, however, submits that there is no averment in the representation regarding the date on which petitioner’s land was acquired, the plot number, the extent of land acquired, the village, or anything else. He submits that such a representation cannot be decided.
UKHC010001892025
2026:UHC:7027
4. This Court has perused the representation, enclosed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
5. This Court finds substance in the submission made by Mr. Saharia, Advocate.
6. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.08.2026 Mahinder