Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1673/2026 of SACHIN Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 10 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1673/2026 Sachin --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

UKHC010135272026

2026:UHC:7051 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

C528/1673/2026 Sachin --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant.

Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

2. By means of the present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant has prayed for staying the recovery warrants issued pursuant to the order dated 29.05.2024 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar, whereby the applicant was directed to deposit 10% of the cheque amount.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has already preferred Criminal Revision No. 87 of 2024 challenging the aforesaid order dated 29.05.2024 and the said revision is still pending consideration before the revisional court. It is further submitted that during the pendency of the revision, recovery warrants have been issued against the applicant. Therefore, it is prayed that the operation and execution of the recovery warrants be stayed till the revision is decided.

4. Considering the innocuous nature of the prayer and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present application is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Revisional UKHC010135272026

2026:UHC:7051 Court to decide Criminal Revision No. 87 of 2024, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.

5. Till the aforesaid revision is decided, the execution of the recovery warrants issued pursuant to the order dated 29.05.2024 shall remain in abeyance.

6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present application stands disposed of.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 10-08-2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f21822fb d40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B52 83D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.08.10 17:25:52 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead