Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/646/2026 of M/S ABDULLA TRADING COMPANY Vs THE COMMISSIONER STATE TAX on 10 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Misc. Bench No. 646 of 2026 10 August, 2026 M/s Abdulla Trading Company --Petitioner Versus The Commissioner, State Tax & Ors. --Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Ashish
UKHC010140992026
2026:UHC:7077-DB
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition Misc. Bench No. 646 of 2026
10 August, 2026
M/s Abdulla Trading Company
--Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner, State Tax & Ors.
--Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Ashish Agarwal and Mr. Tarun Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms. Puja Banga, learned Standing Counsel for the State/Revenue Department JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, C. J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Ashish Agarwal and Mr. Tarun Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner-company and Ms. Puja Banga, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ Revenue Department.
2. The petitioner-company has assailed the order dated 29.07.2024 passed under Section 73 of the CGST/ UKGST Act, 2017, in respect of Financial Year 2019-20. The sole submission of learned counsel for the petitioner-company is that, in the show-cause notice issued to the petitioner- company dated 20.05.2024, no date of personal hearing was fixed, although it is a mandatory requirement under Section 75(4) of the Act.
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ Revenue Department submits that there is
UKHC010140992026
2026:UHC:7077-DB
delay in filing the present Writ Petition, inasmuch as, the order impugned was passed on 29.07.2024.
4. Since it is not being disputed that, in the show- cause notice, no date for personal hearing was fixed, nor the same was provided to the petitioner-company at any stage before passing the impugned order, therefore, there is clear violation of the requirement of Section 75(4) of the Act, which vitiates the order.
5. As principles of natural justice have been violated, therefore, we overrule the objection regarding slight delay on part of the petitioner-company in approaching the Court.
6. The order dated 29.07.2024 is, accordingly, quashed, leaving it open to respondent no.3 to pass a fresh order, after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner- company, strictly in accordance with law.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
8. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 10.08.2026 Rajni