Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/2066/2026 of GAJENDRA SINGH DASILA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 7 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2066/2026 Gajendra Singh Dasila --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Another --Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

UKHC010137132026

2026:UHC:7005 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

WPSS/2066/2026 Gajendra Singh Dasila --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand and Another --Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. I.P. Gairola, learned counsel for petitioner.

2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned D.A.G. for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondents.

3. The petitioner has moved this writ petition with a prayer to direct the respondents to pay the post retiral dues of the petitioner like gratuity and amount of encashment of earned leave and pension under the UPS/NPS Scheme, which has not been paid, according to the petitioner, despite his retirement on 31.03.2026.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after the retirement of petitioner from service on 31.03.2026, he has not been paid his post retiral dues admissible to him.

5. For the said purpose, a representation dated 25.06.2026 has been made by the petitioner to the respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievance, which is still pending. The

UKHC010137132026

2026:UHC:7005 representation is annexed as Annexure no.7 to the writ petition.

6. Learned counsel for petitioner made an innocuous prayer to direct the respondent No.2 to take a quick decision on the representation of the petitioner and to pay the dues admissible to him, as per law, without any further delay.

7. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the said prayer.

8. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 25.06.2026 submitted by petitioner (Annexure No.7 to the writ petition) as per law and accordingly pay the post retiral dues of the petitioner, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

9. Pending application stands disposed of.

(Pankaj Purohit, J.)

07.08.2026 PN

PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f0276c1643 2f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D84BDB0F9 229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2026.08.07 16:34:35 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead