Uttarakhand High Court
AO/75/2025 of M/S RADHEY META ALLOYS PVT LTD Vs M/S B A ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED on 7 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J. AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. 7th August, 2026 APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 75 of 2025 M/s Radhey Meta Alloys Pvt. ………….Appellant Versus M/s B A
UKHC010033572025
2026:UHC:6992-DB
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
7th August, 2026
APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 75 of 2025
M/s Radhey Meta Alloys Pvt.
………….Appellant
Versus
M/s B A Alloys Private Ltd.
----Respondent
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- None for the appellant.
Mr. Nilesh Deep, learned counsel (through V.C) with Mr.
Rajyavardhan Chaudhary, learned counsel for the respondent.
JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present Appeal is directed against the order dated 08.01.2025, passed by the Commercial Court, Kumaun Division, Haldwani, in Commercial Suit No. 36 of 2024, by which, the court has declined to take on record the written statements of the defendant – appellant.
2. No one is present on behalf of the appellant.
3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff – respondent states that suit has already been decided on 19.03.2026. A copy of the said judgment has also been placed before us for perusal, from which, we find the statement to be correct.
4. In view of it, the appeal has become infructuous.
UKHC010033572025
2026:UHC:6992-DB
5. It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
6. The dismissal of the appeal will not come in the way of defendant – appellant to challenge the impugned order in appeal, if filed against the final judgment.
7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 07.08.2026 KKS/PP