Uttarakhand High Court
CRLR/404/2023 of PRAMOD BHATT Vs VANDANA BHATT on 6 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR/404/2023 Pramod Bhatt --Revisionist Versus Vandana Bhatt --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Gurbani Singh (through video
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010097032023
2026:UHC:6966 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CRLR/404/2023 Pramod Bhatt --Revisionist Versus Vandana Bhatt --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
Ms. Gurbani Singh (through video conferencing) and Ms. Shweta Tiwari, learned counsel for the revisionist.
Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. There is a delay in filing the present Criminal Revision. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. Accordingly, the Delay Condonation Application is allowed and the delay in filing the revision is condoned.
3. The present Criminal Revision has been preferred challenging the order dated 06.01.2022, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun, in Complaint Case No. 331 of 2021, whereby interim maintenance of ₹50,000/- per month was awarded to the respondent.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that during the pendency of the present revision, the revisionist and the respondent have amicably settled all their disputes. Pursuant thereto, a compromise application has been filed stating that all pending litigations between the parties shall be governed and disposed of in terms of the said compromise. It is further stated in the compromise application that the parties have agreed to withdraw the pending divorce proceedings and thereafter institute a petition for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Section 27 of the Uniform Civil Code, 2024. It is also agreed between the parties that the UKHC010097032023
2026:UHC:6966 revisionist shall pay a sum of ₹1,70,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Seventy Lakhs only) to the respondent towards full and final permanent alimony. In addition thereto, the revisionist has also agreed to execute a gift deed in favour of the respondent in respect of a flat situated at Dehradun.
5. Learned counsel further submits that the first motion petition has already been filed on 13.05.2026. It is submitted that at the time of filing of the first motion, a sum of ₹1,30,00,000/- had already been paid by the revisionist to the respondent. The balance amount, along with the execution and registration of the gift deed in respect of the aforesaid flat, shall be completed on or before the second motion.
6. The parties are present before this Court through video conferencing.
7. This Court interacted with both the parties, who affirmed the contents of the compromise application and stated that the compromise has been entered into voluntarily, of their own free will, without any coercion, undue influence or pressure.
8. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the terms contained in the compromise application, the impugned order dated 06.01.2022 is hereby set aside. The present Criminal Revision stands disposed of in terms of the compromise.
9. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Alok Mahra, J.) 06-08-2026 SB
SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f21822f bd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B5 283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.08.06 17:59:07 +05'30'