Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/1554/2026 of SHAHNAJ Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010138542026 WPCRL/1554/2026 Shahnaj and Another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Harshpal

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010138542026 WPCRL/1554/2026

Shahnaj and Another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, A.G.A. for the State.

3. Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:- “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to provide adequate security to the petitioners and also to direct the respondent nos. 4 to 6 not to interfere in the life and liberty of the petitioners, in any way.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 03.08.2026 (Annexure No.

3) and provide adequate protection to the petitioners.”

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no. 2 is married to respondent no. 4, but, due to matrimonial discord, both are not living together for last more than two years and a divorce petition has also been filed, which is pending consideration before the concerned court. It is also averred in the writ petition that petitioner no. 1 and petitioner no. 2 are living together. It is further submitted that both the petitioners are major and they are constantly receiving threat from the private respondents.

5. Both the petitioners are present before this Court and they submit that they are facing stiff resistance, and they seriously apprehend threat to their life and limb from the private respondents, and hence they are before this Court praying for protection.

6. In that view of the matter, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection.

7. The Station House Officer, Police Station Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners. The S.H.O. concerned shall also summon the private respondents and counsel them, in accordance with law.

8. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Alok Mahra J.)

06.08.2026 Ujjwal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead