Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/514/2026 of ANOOP BISHT Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 5 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (S/B) No.514 of 2026 5th August, 2026 Anoop Bisht -----Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Another ----Respondents
UKHC010137502026
2026:UHC:6872-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Writ Petition (S/B) No.514 of 2026
5th August, 2026
Anoop Bisht
-----Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Another
----Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Anil Anthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. J.C. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner is District Sports Officer, Pithoragarh. The petitioner had submitted an application on 27.04.2026 giving options for his transfer to Dehradun, Haridwar or Tehri Garhwal. However, he has not been transferred during the annual transfers effected in the month of June, 2026 and, therefore, he has filed the present writ petition for the following relief: “i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.
i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for transfer to Haridwar or any other suitable plain district strictly in accordance with the Uttarakhand Annual Transfer for Public Servants Act, 2017.”
UKHC010137502026
2026:UHC:6872-DB
3. The annual transfers are effected in the month of June every year. The said exercise is complete. As the petitioner has not been transferred during the annual chain of transfers, therefore, he cannot have any grievance nor can he compel the employer to transfer him and that too at a place of his choice.
4. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed but without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to exercise option for transfer in the next year.
5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 05.08.2026 SS