Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/507/2026 of SURENDRA DAYAL AND OTHERS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 4 August 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/507/2026 Surendra Dayal And Others --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Gaurav
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010042252026
2026:UHC:6833 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL/507/2026
Surendra Dayal And Others --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. N.S. Pundir, Advocate for respondent no.5.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking police protection to the petitioners so that they may live their life peacefully and harmoniously without fear or favour at the hands of respondent no.6.
3. Learned State Counsel, on the basis of written instructions received from the concerned police authorities, submits that respondent no.6 has vacated the tenanted premises situate at Vishnu Vihar Colony, Basai Peerumadara, Police Station Ramnagar, District Nainital, where he was previously residing. It is, therefore, submitted that, at present, there is no threat perception to the petitioners from respondent no.6.
4. Learned State Counsel further submits that in Writ Petition (Criminal)
UKHC010042252026
2026:UHC:6833 No.1244 of 2026, filed by respondent no.6, this Court had directed the local police to assess the threat perception to respondent no.4 therein and further observed that, in the event respondent no.6 herein harasses respondent no.4 therein or victimizes his family members, they would be at liberty to approach the concerned Station House Officer, who shall take appropriate action in accordance with law. It is submitted that the same protection under law would equally be available to the present petitioners and, in the event of any genuine threat or harassment at the hands of respondent no.6 in future, they may approach the concerned Station House Officer, who shall examine their grievance and take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by taking the statement of learned State Counsel on record.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
04.08.2026 Arpan
ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a 20dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109 CB987446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.08.04 16:39:38 +05'30'