Uttarakhand High Court

CRLR/129/2016 of Smt. Rajni Vs Ashok Kumar Sharma on 4 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR/129/2016 Smt. Rajni --Revisionist Versus Ashok Kumar Sharma --Respondent With CRLR/111/2016 Ashok Kumar Sharma --Revisionist Versus

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

UKHC010011912016

2026:UHC:6814 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

CRLR/129/2016

Smt. Rajni --Revisionist Versus Ashok Kumar Sharma --Respondent With CRLR/111/2016

Ashok Kumar Sharma --Revisionist Versus Smt. Rajni --Respondent

Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Ms. Urmila Mehta proxy counsel for Ms. Prabha Naithnai, learned counsel for the revisionist.

2. Ms. Irum Zeba proxy counsel for Mr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel for respondent.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the revisionists would submit that the present criminal revisions have become as the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and have entered into a lawful compromise, pursuant to which a compounding application has been filed before the competent court. She would further submit that the proceedings giving rise to the present revisions arise out of cross-cases lodged by the respective parties against each other, and in view of the settlement UKHC010011912016

2026:UHC:6814 arrived at between them, no surviving grievance remains for adjudication in these revisions.

4. In view of the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the revisionists and the subsequent amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, nothing survives for consideration in the present criminal revisions. Accordingly, the criminal revisions are dismissed as having become infructuous.

5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 04-08-2026 Mamta

MAMTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f244f3e584af1449 e430ef900bf09a6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9cabfd54852c9e 68911ca8b66dd26690a191648ab5d8dd004ef 0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.08.05 17:35:12 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead