Uttarakhand High Court
C447/14/2025 of SEEMA DEVI Vs PANKAJ ASWAL on 31 July 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C447/14/2025 Seema Devi -- Applicant Versus Pankaj Aswal -- Respondent Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned counsel for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010061172025
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
C447/14/2025
Seema Devi
-- Applicant Versus Pankaj Aswal
-- Respondent
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Today on instructions, learned counsel for the applicant makes a submission that the proceedings under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. was dismissed for non prosecution before the Family Court, Dehardun, and the applicant would soon be preferring restoration application. Since today, there are no proceedings in the present case, hence the present application has become infructuous. However, learned counsel for the applicant would make a request that in case the maintenance application is restored, then he may be permitted to file a fresh transfer application.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the transfer application is dismissed as infructuous at this stage.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
31.07.2026
UKHC010061172025
Shiv/