Uttarakhand High Court
ABA/1138/2023 of HASEEN AHMAD ALIAS MOHD HASEEN Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/1138/2023 Haseen Ahmad Alias Mohd Haseen --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mohd.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010202862023
2026:UHC:6702 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
ABA/1138/2023
Haseen Ahmad Alias Mohd Haseen --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. N.S. Kanyal and Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, would submit that the investigation has been concluded and the final report has already been submitted before the competent court. It is, therefore, contended that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute the aforesaid factual position.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the application for anticipatory bail does not survive after submission of the final report, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
6. No order as to costs.
(Alok Mahra, J.) 31-07-2026 mamta