Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/611/2026 of JAGDISH CHAND RAMOLA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 611 of 2026 31st July, 2026 Jagdish Chand Ramola ……Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others
UKHC010134892026
2026:UHC:6660-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 611 of 2026
31st July, 2026
Jagdish Chand Ramola
……Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others
----Respondents
Presence:-
Mrs. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. B.P.S. Mer, learned Standing Counsel with Mr. M.S. Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State.
JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The grievance urged in the present writ petition is that the proposed road Rawatgaon-Kanda-Jevala is being laid at a considerable higher alignment as compared to the village abadi and also at a substantial distance. Consequently, it would not be of much utility to the petitioner and the villagers for whose benefit, the road is being constructed. On the said ground, the petitioner has challenged the tender notice dated 18.06.2026, issued by Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Provincial Division, PWD, Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. The petitioner has also prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the representations made by the petitioner; and the villagers before commencing the construction work.
UKHC010134892026
2026:UHC:6660-DB
2. The alignment of the road is to be decided by the experts and this Court, by issuing a writ of mandamus cannot compel the authorities to change the alignment of the road.
3. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to press the representation stated to have been made by him on 26.02.2026, before the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Provincial Division, PWD, Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal. It is further directed that upon the petitioner filing copy of the instant order along with copy of the aforesaid representation before respondent no.3, within one week from today, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent no.3 by passing a speaking order within next three weeks.
4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.)
Dated: 31.07.2026 KKS/PP