Uttarakhand High Court

WPCRL/1487/2026 of MOHAMMAD TALIB Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010133012026 WPCRL/1487/2026 Mohammad Talib --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Rajni Rangwal

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010133012026 WPCRL/1487/2026

Mohammad Talib --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Ms. Rajni Rangwal and Mr. Ankush Singhal, Advocates for the petitioner.

2. Mr. V.S. Pal, A.G.A. for the State.

3. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- “i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to De-Seal the medical store of the petitioner, as the petitioner is facing great hardship.”

4. In this case, an FIR was lodged on 09.07.2026, registered as FIR/Case Crime No. 89 of 2026, under Sections 22, 8 of NDPS, at Police Station-Kelakhera, District Udham Singh Nagar.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has been named in the FIR, but, no contraband was alleged to have been recovered from his medical store, but, despite this, medical store of the petitioner has been seized by the Police Authorities, without there being any order from the Competent Authority. Thus, it is submitted that the Police officials failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of NDPS Act.

6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

7. This Court finds some substance in the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

8. Since, neither any recovery of the alleged contraband was made inside the medical store, nor any contraband was alleged to have been recovered from the medical store of the petitioner, therefore, S.H.O., Kelakhera, District Udham Singh Nagar is hereby directed to open the seal of the medical store and handover the possession of the medical store to the petitioner within a period of 24 hours from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

9. With the aforesaid observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(Alok Mahra J.)

30.07.2026 Ujjwal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead