Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/1496/2026 of SMT. JYOTI AND ANR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 29 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/1496/2026 Smt. Jyoti And Anr --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mrs. Sangeeta
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010133802026
2026:UHC:6555 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL/1496/2026
Smt. Jyoti And Anr --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mrs. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Manoj Bhatt, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. Petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following relief:
“(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding/directing the respondent nos.1, 2 & 3 to provide adequate protection to the lives and liberties of the petitioners.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners were in a relationship with each other and they have solemnized their marriage on 24.07.2026 in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals. It is submitted that respondent nos.4 to 10, who are family members and relatives of petitioner no.1, are opposed to the said marriage and has been extending threats to the petitioners. On account of such opposition, the petitioners apprehend danger to their life and personal liberty at the hands of the private respondents. It is further submitted that both the petitioners have attained the age of majority.
UKHC010133802026
2026:UHC:6555
4. Both the petitioners are present before this Court, who have been duly identified by their learned counsel. They state that they have voluntarily solemnized their marriage of their own free will, without any force, coercion or undue influence.
5. The documents on record reveal that both the petitioners are major. In that view of the matter, and in view of the ruling of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs State of U.P. and another, reported in (2006) 5 SCC 475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection.
6. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the petitioners. The S.H.O. is further directed to summon the private respondents, and such other persons, who are inimically placed towards the marriage of the petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law.
7. The writ petition stands ordered accordingly.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
29.07.2026 Arpan
ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a2 0dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109C B987446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2026.07.29 17:26:25 +05'30'