Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1568/2025 of VIVEK RANA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 28 July 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010133602025 2026:UHC:6518 UKHC010133602025 BA1/1568/2025 Vivek Rana --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010133602025
2026:UHC:6518
UKHC010133602025 BA1/1568/2025 Vivek Rana --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Mr. Rajesh Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. The present applicant – Vivek Rana S/o Ayodhya Prasad, is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 16.05.2025 bearing FIR No.151 of 2025, Police Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein, the present applicant has been implicated by the victim for the offences punishable under Sections 69 and 351 (2) of BNS, 2023.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the chargesheet has already been filed in a very mechanical manner. He further submits that in fact the victim is already a married lady, therefore, there is no any question to marry with the lady/victim and the entire allegations are false and frivolous. He further submits that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 16.05.2025 and the trial has already been commenced, therefore, taking into consideration that the present applicant is languishing in jail since last more than one year and the trial has not been concluded so far, therefore, the applicant be released on bail.
5. On the other side, Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned AGA, have not disputed that the chargesheet has been filed and the trial has already been commenced and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 16.05.2025.
6. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and taking into consideration that the applicant is languishing in jail since 16.05.2025 and the chargesheet was filed on 06.07.2025 and the applicant have no criminal antecedents, and the trial though has been commenced but not concluded so far, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant – “Vivek Rana”, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the condition that after being released on bail the applicant shall join the Trial Court proceedings on each and every date without seeking any unnecessary adjournment.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
28.07.2026 Nitesh/