Uttarakhand High Court

BA1/1658/2025 of GAUTAM RAY Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010139822025 2026:UHC:6519 UKHC010139822025 BA1/1658/2025 Gautam Ray --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010139822025

2026:UHC:6519

UKHC010139822025 BA1/1658/2025 Gautam Ray --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant bail application is rendered infructuous since the coordinate Bench has already quashed the entire proceedings.

4. In such view of the matter, the instant bail application is dismissed as infructuous.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)

28.07.2026 Nitesh/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead