Uttarakhand High Court
WPCRL/1322/2026 of HEENA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 28 July 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010120512026 WPCRL/1322/2026 Heena --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Shumayla Zafri, Advocate
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UKHC010120512026 WPCRL/1322/2026
Heena --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Ms. Shumayla Zafri, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, A.G.A. for the State.
3. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- “(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to provide the Police protection to the petitioner against the respondent nos. 4, 5, 6 and 7 so that she may spend her normal life safely and peacefully.”
4. On the last date, State was directed to assess the threat perception upon the petitioner.
5. On instructions, learned State Counsel would submit that the private respondents were called upon by the Police and they have given the undertaking they have never extended any threat to the petitioner and in future also, they will not give any threat to the petitioner.
6. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Alok Mahra J.)
28.07.2026 Ujjwal