Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/708/2026 of MOHIT SAHRA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 27 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/708/2026 Mohit Sahra --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon,
UKHC010070362026
2026:UHC:6423
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/708/2026
Mohit Sahra
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. The present applicant ‘Mohit Sahra’ S/o Rakesh Kumar is seeking bail in reference to First Information Report dated 06.04.2026 bearing FIR No. 61 of 2026 P.S. Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein, the present applicant along with three others have been implicated for the offences punishable under section 3, 4, 5, 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, P.S. Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the present applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and in fact he was serving simply as a worker in the SPA Center and two other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court. He further submits that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 06.04.2026 and the charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that all the offences are triable by Magistrate and there is no previous criminal antecedent of the applicant.
5. On the other side, Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A. have not disputed that the other two co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court and the applicant has no previous criminal history and also submits that the charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the offences are triable by the Magistrate.
UKHC010070362026
2026:UHC:6423
6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the other two co-accused have been enlarged on bail and the charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant has no previous criminal history and the offences are triable by the Magistrate, this court is of the view that the applicant deserve for bail.
7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant ‘Mohit Sahra’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 27.07.2026 PR