Uttarakhand High Court

C528/839/2024 of ANIL KUMAR ALIAS ANIL KAPOOR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Compounding Appl. No. 7 of 2026 In C528/839/2024 Anil Kumar Alias Anil Kapoor & anr. --Applicants Versus State Of Uttarakhand &

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

Compounding Appl. No. 7 of 2026

In

C528/839/2024

Anil Kumar Alias Anil Kapoor & anr.

--Applicants

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand & Ors.

--Respondents

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Sohil Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants.

2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the respondent.

4. The applicants are challenging the charge sheet arising out of FIR dated 09.09.2023, bearing Case Crime No. 0545 of 2023, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar wherein both the applicants have been charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 385 and 506 IPC.

5. Now compounding application IA No. 7 of 2026 has been moved, supported with the affidavits of the applicants and the complainant, with this contention that both the parties have settled their disputes and their relations are very cordial and both applicant no. 2 and respondent no. 3 are real sisters.

6. Both the applicants are present in Court and are identified by their counsel. Respondent no. 3 also joined the proceeding through V.C.

7. It is argued by the learned counsel for the parties that though the offences in which charge sheet has been filed are non- compoundable but since dispute was nothing but a family dispute which they have resolved, therefore, with the leave of the Court the offences can be compounded.

8. The State counsel has no objection.

9. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the parties have resolved their family disputes amicably, therefore, this Court is of the view that the continuation of the proceeding is nothing but will be a futile exercise.

10. Accordingly, the compounding application as well the C528 application are allowed. Charge sheet dated 03.10.2026 arising out of FIR dated 09.09.2023, bearing Case Crime No. 0545 of 2023, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee District Haridwar is hereby quashed.

(Rakesh Thapliyal,J.) 27.06.2026. Parul

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead