Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1594/2026 of ANKIT MOGHA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 24 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1594/2026 Ankit Mogha --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand and another --Respondents Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Meenu

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

C528/1594/2026

Ankit Mogha

--Applicant

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand and another

--Respondents

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Ms. Meenu Kashyap, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA for the State.

3. The instant petition is preferred under Section 528 of BNSS 2023 the applicant by challenging the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 7110 of 2019 arising out of FIR No.41 of 2019 State vs. Ankit Mogha and others wherein he has been summoned to face the trial for the offences punishable under Section 170 of 171 of IPC, Police Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/5th Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar as well as the proceeding initiated under Section 82 of Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that she is not arguing on merit and the present applicant is ready to face the trial and want to surrender before the court concerned but till such time the applicant is surrender the proceeding initiated under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. may be suspended.

5. On the other hand, Mr. Himanshu

Sain, learned AGA have not object on such submissions since the prayer as made by learned counsel for the applicant appears to be innocuous.

6. In such view of the matter, the instant petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the applicant to surrender before the trial court on or before 10th of August 2026 till such time the proceeding as initiate under Section 82 of Cr.P.C shall remain suspended.

7. It is further made clear that if the applicant fails to surrender on or before 10th of August 2026, the proceeding initiated under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. shall automatically be revived. It is further observed that if after surrender the applicant move the bail application the concerned court may expedite the same as early as possible.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)

24-07-2026 Nahid

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead