Uttarakhand High Court

WPMB/559/2026 of MS AKHAND ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 23rd July, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO.559 of 2026 M/s Akhand Enterprises Private Ltd. ------Petitioner Versus The Deputy Commissioner and

UKHC010115812026

2026:UHC:5894-DB

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA

AND

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY

23rd July, 2026

WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO.559 of 2026

M/s Akhand Enterprises Private Ltd.

------Petitioner

Versus

The Deputy Commissioner and Others ----Respondents Presence:- Mr. Harsh Ojha, learned counsel through V.C. along with Mr. Kanti Ram Sharma, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Manoj Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Ms. Pooja Banga, learned Standing Counsel for the State through V.C.

Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- “i. Issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned Recovery Order dated 18.06.2025 in Form DRC-18 issued under Section 79(1)(c) of the GST Act, through Revenue Authority, for the Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020, and 2020-2021, against M/s Akhand Enterprises Private Limited (GSTIN:09AADCA6394B2ZP), in respect of an alleged tax liability of M/s Kama Metal & Alloys Pvt. Ltd., GSTIN No. 05AACCK4069Q1Z2) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Roorkee, Haridwar, District Haridwar, involving a demand of Rs. 72,40,15,618/- (Rupees Seventy-Two Crore Forty Lakh Fifteen Thousand Six Hundred Eighteen Only), whereby Respondent no.1 is seeking recovery through a third- party recovery process. (Containing Annexure No. 5 page no.56 to 60 to this writ petition).”

2. Mr. Harsh Ojha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the respondents are not

UKHC010115812026

2026:UHC:5894-DB proceeding on basis of the impugned recovery proceedings, therefore, he is not pressing the writ petition.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

4. Pending application, if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)

(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 23.07.2026 KKS/PP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead