Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1579/2026 of AKANSHA GOEL AND ORS Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010127522026 C528/1579/2026 Akansha Goel And Ors --Applicants Versus State Of Uttarakhand and another --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and

Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010127522026

C528/1579/2026

Akansha Goel And Ors

--Applicants

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand and another

--Respondent

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Shariq Khurshid, learned counsel for the applicants.

2. Mrs. Meenaksi Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel for the complainant.

4. The instant petition is preferred under Section 528 of BNSS 2023 on behalf of the applicants namely Akansha Goel D/o Manoj Goel, Subhav Goel, S/o Manoj Goel, Manoj Goel, S/o Narendra Prakash Goel and Sadhna Goel @ Sadhna Rani Goel, W/o Manoj Goel for quashing of the proceeding of Criminal Case No.13 of 2026 arising out of FIR dated 14.05.2025 bearing FIR No. 0121 of 2025, registered at Police Station I.T.I., District Udham Singh Nagar pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate,

Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar wherein on all the applicants have been summoned to face the trial for the offences punishable under Section 85 and 118(1) of BNS 2023. The dispute is in fact arising out of matrimonial discord in between the applicant no.2 and the respondent no.2, due to which and both of them are living separately since 2023.

5. The petition is filed along with the compounding application, i.e., IA No. 1 of 2026 supported with the affidavits of all the applicants and the respondent no.2/complainant with this contention that now the parties have settled their disputes to get permanent separation by way of mutual consent and towards permanent alimony, it is also agreed that the applicant no. 2 shall pay a sum of Rs. 20,00,000/- (twenty lakhs) to the respondent no.2/wife. It is further contended that the total amount towards the permanent alimony of Rs. 20,00,000/- (twenty lakhs) by way of demand draft is handed over to a Mediator namely Sachin Goel to whom both the parties trust.

6. All the applicants and respondent no. 2/complainant are present and identified by their respective counsels. The complainant who is present along with her brother submits that since they have settled the dispute to get permanent separation by way of seeking divorce through a mutual consent, therefore, the proceedings be closed.

7. On the other side, Mrs. Meenakshi Sharma, learned AGA submits that since the dispute arising out of a matrimonial discord and now the parties have settled their disputes to get divorce by way of mutual consent, therefore, in such an eventuality to continue the proceedings is completely a futile exercise.

8. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the terms and conditions of amicable settlement reflected from the compounding application and the fact that the entire amount towards the permanent alimony of Rs. 20,00,000/- (twenty lakhs) through a demand draft is already handed over to a mediator namely Sachin Goel to whom both the parties trust, this Court is of the view that the present petition and as well as the compounding application deserve to be allowed.

9. Accordingly, the present petition as well as the compounding application are allowed and the entire proceedings of

Criminal Case No.13 of 2026 State vs. Akansha Goel and others pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate Kashipur District Udham Singh Nagar is hereby quashed.

10. It is made clear that both, the applicant no.2 and respondent no.2 are directed to present divorce petition by way of mutual consent before the appropriate Court within 15 days from today, and thereafter Family Court proceed and expedite the divorce proceedings positively within 15 days.

11. It is further made clear that the concerned court will not compel the parties to complete the statutory period of separation since both of them are living separately since 2023.

12. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)

23-07-2026 Nahid

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead