Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/2476/2025 of AMIT KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 22 July 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010204262025 2026:UHC:6237 UKHC010204262025 BA1/2476/2025 Amit Kumar --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010204262025
2026:UHC:6237
UKHC010204262025 BA1/2476/2025 Amit Kumar --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. The present applicant – Amit Kumar S/o Sanjay Vishwas, is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 23.11.2025 bearing FIR No.1200 of 2025, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar, wherein, he has been implicated for the offence punishable under Sections 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the alleged prohibited drug which is shown to be recovered is non commercial one. He further submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 24.11.2025. He further submits that the chargesheet has already been filed.
5. On the other side, learned AGA submits that the alleged prohibited drug which is shown to be recovered is non commercial one and the applicant has no previous criminal history and the chargesheet has already been filed.
6. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and taking into consideration that the quantity of the prohibited drug which is shown to be recovered, and the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant – “Amit Kumar”, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the following conditions:- “(a) The applicant after being released on bail shall join trial court proceedings on each and every date without seeking unnecessary adjournment.
(b) The applicant shall surrender his passport if any before the trial court.
(c) He shall not indulge in any such activity in future. In breach of conditions as above, prosecution shall move bail cancellation application.” (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
22.07.2026 Nitesh/