Uttarakhand High Court
ABA/1142/2025 of ASHISH KUMAR SAINI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 21 July 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010158452025 ABA/1142/2025 Ashish Kumar Saini --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mohd. Safdar,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UKHC010158452025 ABA/1142/2025
Ashish Kumar Saini --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant.
2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State.
3. Mr. Abhishek Singh Rawat, Advocate for the complainant.
4. By means of the present application, the applicant seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 59 of 2025, registered at Police Station Rudraprayag, District Rudraprayag, for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2) and 69 of BNS.
5. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that the investigation has been concluded and the Investigating Officer has already submitted the charge-sheet before the competent Court.
6. In reply, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court, vide order dated 13.10.2025, granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicant and pursuant thereto, the applicant has remained available to the Investigating Officer and has fully cooperated with the investigation. It is further submitted that the investigation now stands concluded, the charge-sheet has been filed, and no material has been brought on record to indicate that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is either necessary or required. It is, therefore, prayed that the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant be confirmed.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the material available on record, and considering the fact that the applicant has remained protected under the interim order dated 13.10.2025, has duly cooperated with the investigation, the investigation has been completed, the charge- sheet has already been submitted before the competent Court, and there is nothing on record to suggest that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is now required, this Court is of the opinion that the interim protection granted to the applicant deserves to be confirmed. No opinion is being expressed on the merits of the case.
8. Accordingly, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 13.10.2025 is made absolute. The applicant shall continue to remain on anticipatory bail on the same terms and conditions as contained in the order dated 13.10.2025, subject to compliance thereof and subject to any other condition(s), if imposed by the trial Court in accordance with law.
9. The anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, allowed.
10. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Alok Mahra J.)
21.07.2026 Ujjwal