Uttarakhand High Court

BA2/87/2026 of AMAN KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010106682026 BA2/87/2026 Aman Kumar --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Yogesh Upadhayay,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

UKHC010106682026 BA2/87/2026

Aman Kumar --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Yogesh Upadhayay, Advocate for the applicant.

2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State.

3. This second bail application has been moved by the applicant – Aman Kumar, seeking regular bail in Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 209 of 2025, under Sections 109, 115(2), 126(2), 191(3), 117(2) and 351(3) of BNS, registered at Police Station I.T.I., District Udham Singh Nagar.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that all the co-accused, having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. Learned counsel further submits that it is a case of parity and in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the same and will furnish the bail surety as per the satisfaction of this Court.

5. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, admits the fact that all the co-accused, having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court.

6. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the fact that all the co-accused, having similar role, have already been granted bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage.

7. The present bail application is allowed.

8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned, subject the following conditions:-

i) The applicant shall attend the trial Court regularly, and, he will not seek any unnecessary adjournment.

ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case.

iii) The applicant shall not leave India without any prior permission of the trial Court.

9. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution will be free to move the court for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Mahra J.)

21.07.2026 Ujjwal

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead