Uttarakhand High Court
ABA/486/2023 of ARTI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 21 July 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010097552023 ABA/486/2023 Arti --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UKHC010097552023 ABA/486/2023
Arti --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate for the applicant.
2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State.
3. Today, learned State Counsel would submit that chargesheet has been filed in the matter, but, applicant is not made an accused in the chargesheet, therefore, nothing survives in the matter. As such, the matter has become infructuous.
4. Since, chargesheet has been filed and applicant is not made an accused in the chargesheet, therefore, the matter has become infructuous. As such, the present anticipatory bail application stands disposed of accordingly.
(Alok Mahra J.)
21.07.2026 Ujjwal