Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1560/2026 of VINOD CHAURASIYA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1560/2026 With IA 1/2026 (For Compounding Application) Vinod Chaurasiya --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent

UKHC010126142026

2026:UHC:6152

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

C528/1560/2026

With

IA 1/2026 (For Compounding Application)

Vinod Chaurasiya

--Applicant

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand

--Respondent

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Amit Kapri, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. Mr. Chandramauli Shah, learned counsel for the respondent.

4. The instant petition is moved by the present applicant ‘Vinod Chaurasiya S/o Jeet Lal Chaurasiya along with the compounding application for quashing of proceeding of Criminal Case No. 723 of 2018 ‘State vs. Vinod Chaurasiya’ pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun, wherein, the present applicant is summoned to face the trial for the offences punishable under sections 498A, 323, 504 of IPC r/w section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act arising out of Case Crime No. 61 of 2017.

5. The applicant is present in court and the respondent/complainant joined the proceeding through V.C. and both of them are identified by their respective counsel.

6. It is submitted in the compounding application that the dispute in between the parties is due the matrimonial discord, which has now been settled by both the parties and the divorce petition is already filed, which is pending for consideration. It is submitted that both the parties UKHC010126142026

2026:UHC:6152 have settled their matrimonial dispute, therefore, the proceedings be dropped.

7. The complainant also submits that she do not want to pursue the proceeding.

8. Learned State counsel have not objected on this since the parties have settled their matrimonial dispute and a divorce petition is filed by way of mutual consent, therefore, there is no useful purpose to continue the proceeding.

9. After hearing the submission of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the parties have settled their matrimonial dispute, therefore, there is no useful purpose to continue the proceeding.

10. In such view of the matter the present application as well as the compounding application are allowed and the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 723 of 2018 ‘State vs. Vinod Chaurasiya’ pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun, is hereby quashed.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 21.07.2026 PR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead