Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1550/2026 of PANKAJ KASHYAP Vs RAM BHAJAN SHAH on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1550/2026 Pankaj Kashyap --Applicant Versus Ram Bhajan Shah --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Alok Kumar, learned

UKHC010125222026

2026:UHC:6049

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

C528/1550/2026

Pankaj Kashyap

--Applicant

Versus

Ram Bhajan Shah

--Respondent

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Alok Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant.

2. By the instant petition, the applicant is challenging the proceeding of Complaint Case No. 4535 of 2023, Ram Bhajan vs. Pankaj Kashyap, which is a proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is ready to face the trial court proceeding, however, since, non bailable warrants have been issued the same may be kept in abeyance subject to this condition that the applicant shall ensure his presence before the Trial Court on the next date fixed.

4. After hearing the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant and taking into consideration that the applicant is ready to face the trial court proceeding, the non bailable warrants issued against him shall remain in abeyance subject to the condition that the applicant shall ensure his presence before the Trial Court on the next date fixed. It is made clear that if the applicant fails to ensure his presence before the Trial Court on the next date fixed, the non bailable warrants issued against him shall automatically revive.

5. Subject to the observation and direction as above, the instant C528 petition is disposed of finally.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J)

20.07.2026 Parul

UKHC010125222026

2026:UHC:6049

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead