Uttarakhand High Court

C528/1514/2026 of SUDHIR MALIK Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS C528/1514/2026 Sudhir Malik --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, learned

UKHC010122492026

SL.

No.

Date

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

or directions

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

C528/1514/2026

Sudhir Malik

--Applicant

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand

--Respondent

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA for the State.

3. Present applicant has filed the instant application under Section C528 of BNSS, 2023 along with the exemption application seeking exemption to file affidavit since he is in jail in relation to Special Sessions Trial No. 9 of 2022 arising out of FIR No. 01 of 2022 wherein the applicant is facing the trial for the offence punishable under Section 2 / 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act. By this petition the applicant challenging the judgment and order dated 25.05.2026 passed by Special Sessions Judge / 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Nainital whereby the trial court refused to grant 15 days time to produce sureties.

4. Appellant, herein, was granted bail by the Coordinate Bench on 20.04.2026 on executing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that appellant could not arrange the two sureties, as ordered by the Coordinate Bench while granting bail, therefore, the appellant be released on bail in compliance of the order of the Coordinate Bench on personal bond with the condition that within 15 days, he will furnish two UKHC010122492026

sureties.

6. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General has no objection to it, however, he submits that some rider may be imposed that if appellant fails to produce sureties within 15 days after his release, he will surrender before the court concerned.

7. After taking into consideration the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, order dated 20.04.2026 passed by the Coordinate Bench is modified to the extent that appellant shall be released on executing his personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and after being released on bail, he shall furnish two sureties within 15 days, in terms of order dated 20.04.2026 passed by the trial court and if he fails to furnish two sureties, he shall surrender before the trial court, immediately on expiry of 15 days from the date of release.

8. The instant C528 application stands disposed of finally in above term.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 20.07.2026 SKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead