Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/527/2026 of DESIGN TECH STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT Vs PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DEHRADUN on 17 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 527 of 2026 17th July, 2026 Design Tech Structural Consultant -----Petitioner Versus Public Works Department
UKHC010108172026
2026:UHC:5952-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 527 of 2026
17th July, 2026
Design Tech Structural Consultant
-----Petitioner
Versus
Public Works Department Dehradun and Others
----Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Shakti S. Purohit, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioner through V.C.
Mr. Amrendra Pratap Singh, learned Additional Advocate General with Mr. B.P.S. Mer, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the decision of the Technical Evaluation Committee rejecting the petitioner’s bid in the technical round.
2. Learned State Counsel states that the advertisement itself has been cancelled. The communication received by him from the concerned Executive Engineer has been placed on record along with order dated 18.06.2026 cancelling the tender.
3. In view of the said development, the challenge has been rendered infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 17.07.2026 KKS/PP 1