Uttarakhand High Court
ABA/292/2026 of SAHIBAA JAIN Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/292/2026 Sahibaa Jain --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Tushar Prajapati, learned
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
UKHC010122032026
2026:UHC:5939 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
ABA/292/2026 Sahibaa Jain --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Tushar Prajapati, learned counsel for the applicant.
Mrs. Pushpa Bhatt, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. and Mr. Nikhil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. The present Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 313 of 2019, registered under Section 2/3 of the Uttarakhand (Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention)) Act at Police Station Kotwali, District Dehradun.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant is suffering from severe and advanced liver ailments and, on account of her medical condition as well as matrimonial disputes, she could not appear before the Court concerned.
4. Per contra, learned State Counsel opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that the applicant has been deliberately evading the process of law. It is further submitted that a non-bailable warrant has already been issued against the applicant by the Court concerned and, thereafter, proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of UKHC010122032026
2026:UHC:5939 Criminal Procedure have also been initiated against her.
5. In response, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is ready and willing to surrender before the Court concerned and shall avail the remedy available to her in accordance with law by filing an appropriate application before the competent Court.
6. It is further submitted that the applicant undertakes to cooperate with the proceedings and shall not evade the process of law in future.
7. In view of the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the applicant, no further orders are required to be passed in the present anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
(Alok Mahra, J.) 17-07-2026
SB
SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c 12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BE D00E67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.07.17 17:02:30 +05'30'