Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/574/2026 of MANOJ KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 July 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010056652026 2026:UHC:6030 UKHC010056652026 BA1/574/2026 Manoj Kumar --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UKHC010056652026
2026:UHC:6030
UKHC010056652026 BA1/574/2026 Manoj Kumar --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. The present applicant – Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar, is praying for bail in a reference to FIR dated 16.03.2026 bearing FIR No.91 of 2026, Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein, on completion of the investigation in total three persons have been chargesheeted including the present applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 109 of BNS, 2023 read with Sections 3, 5, 25, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and in fact in the said incident the co-accused sustained gunshot injury, but he is also made an accused though as per prosecution it is a case of no injury. He further submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and the chargesheet has been filed and is languishing in jail since 16.03.2026.
5. On the other side, Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA, have not disputed that the chargesheet has already been filed and the present applicant have no criminal antecedents.
6. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and taking into consideration that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 16.03.2026, and the chargesheet has already been filed and the applicant has no criminal antecedents, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant – Manoj Kumar, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
17.07.2026 Nitesh/