Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/838/2026 of VIKAS KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 17 July 2026
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1/838/2026 Vikas Kumar --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Prem Kaushal, learned
SL.
No.
Date
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1/838/2026
Vikas Kumar
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Prem Kaushal, learned counsel with Mr. Mahesh Chandra learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Present applicant Vikas Kumar, S/o Vijay Pal is praying for bail in reference to FIR dated 29.04.2026, bearing FIR No. 198 of 2026, P.S. Rudrapur District Udham Singh Nagar wherein the present applicant along with Harish Shah and Omvijay have been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 143 BNS 2023 read with Section 3,4,5 and 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention).
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and is in judicial custody since 29.04.2026, and, in fact, he is working as sweeper in the spa centre and he has no direct nexus with the offence as alleged. He further submits that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedent and if he is enlarged on bail he will cooperate with the ongoing investigation. He further submits that the applicant will not make any attempt to influence the witness or to make any attempt to effect the ongoing investigation.
5. On the other side, learned counsel for the State have not disputed that the applicant have no criminal history, however, he submits that the investigation is still going on and the applicant is languishing in jail since 29.04.2026.
6. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the applicant has no previous criminal history and is languishing in jail since 29.04.2026, therefore, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.
7. Accordingly without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant Vikas Kumar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:
(i) After being released on bail the applicant shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
(ii) The applicant will not indulge in any such activity in future and if he is found to be indulged in any such activity, the prosecution is free to move an application for cancellation of bail.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
17-07-2026
Parul