Uttarakhand High Court
C482/243/2019 of DALVINDER SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 16 July 2026
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010022192019 C482/243/2019 Dalvinder Singh --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Zakir Ali,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
UKHC010022192019 C482/243/2019
Dalvinder Singh --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent
Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. Zakir Ali, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Mohd. Umar, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General along with Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. Mr. S. K. Shandilya, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
4. The copy of the judgment/order dated 12.12.2019 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar, is taken on record.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement that the applicant has since died.
6. Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 submits, on the strength of a copy of the judgment and order dated 12.12.2019 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar in Sessions Trial No. 21 of 2016, State v.
Dalvinder Singh and Others, that the said sessions trial, from which the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has arisen, has already been decided by the judgment and order dated 12.12.2019, whereby the applicant and the other accused persons have been convicted.
7. In view of the statements made by the learned counsel for the parties, the instant criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed as having become infructuous/abated.
(Siddhartha Sah, J.)
16.07.2026 BS