Uttarakhand High Court
AO/190/2026 of GAURAV AGROHI Vs JAGDISH SINGH PIMOLI on 16 July 2026
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 12 UKHC010090142026 2026:UHC:5891 AO No.190 of 2026 Gaurav Agrohi ........Appellant v. Jagdish Singh Pimoli ......Respondent Hon’ble Ravindra
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 12
UKHC010090142026
2026:UHC:5891
AO No.190 of 2026
Gaurav Agrohi
........Appellant
v.
Jagdish Singh Pimoli
......Respondent
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. Jai Krishna Pandey, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Shubham Pandey, Advocate for the respondent. Heard. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant had purchased a property but the boundaries were wrongly mentioned in the sale deed, though the longitude and latitude, as established in the sale deed, falls on the same place which he has purchased. Therefore, he had moved application before the Tehsildar for setting aside the ex parte order of rejection of the mutation application. He seeks permission to withdraw the appeal with the liberty to file fresh temporary injunction application after change of circumstances. Permission is accorded. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as above.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
16.07.2026 RV